Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

people who have problems

English answer:

avoid appointing anyone who has a poor track record/any past issues

Added to glossary by mockingbird (X)
May 13, 2005 02:56
19 yrs ago
English term

people who have problems

English Other Journalism
I am translating a title of an article:

Do not appoint people who have problems

(regarding the plan to reshuffle a board of directors and commisioners of a company, and then to elect/select/appoint those who have no problems to replace those reshuffled)

Is there any other ways to rephrase "those who have problems"?

(problems may refer to indication of corruption, or bad track record)

Discussion

Non-ProZ.com May 13, 2005:
those who have no problems means that the people is clean, has no history of fraud, corruption and etc etc

Responses

+12
5 mins
Selected

avoid appointing anyone who has a poor track record/any past issues

-
try to appoint people with clean records

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2005-05-13 03:02:46 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

no skeletons in their closets (no hidden, buried past issues with the law)
Peer comment(s):

agree Gabo Pena
1 min
thanks Bo :-)
agree Ildiko Santana
4 mins
thanks Ildiko :-)
agree NancyLynn : clean record
12 mins
Hi Nancy!
agree sarahl (X) : iow no shady characters!
36 mins
you tell 'em, honey :-)
agree Robert Donahue (X)
1 hr
No skeletons allowed (at the halloween party :-)
agree David Hollywood : clean record works very well :)
1 hr
thanks David :-)
agree Balasubramaniam L.
2 hrs
thanks Balasubramaniam :-)
agree Kenneth Denmark
3 hrs
thanks Kenneth :-)
agree Vicky Papaprodromou
7 hrs
Hi Vicky :-)
agree Angela Dickson (X)
8 hrs
thanks Angela!
agree Alfa Trans (X)
9 hrs
thanks Marju!
agree Alexandra Tussing
23 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "well, thanks answerers, and to all of those who have tried to help me"
+2
9 mins

questionable

people with questionable track record.

If it is not a do's and don'ts kind of list, you could turn it around and say in a positive way:

Appoint only those with a clean record.
Peer comment(s):

agree Refugio : Appoint only those with a clean record
1 hr
Thanks.
agree Nick Lingris : Steer clear of / Filter out those with a questionable track record
8 hrs
Thanks.
Something went wrong...
+2
32 mins

Appoint only those with impeccable corporate track records

I would avoid using the negative if this is for the TITLE of an article.
Peer comment(s):

agree Balasubramaniam L. : That is what I also said... and Rita too, I see now. Great minds think alike!
1 hr
yes, best to avoid negatives in titles.
agree Nick Lingris : Yes, if mockingbird wants to "steer clear of negatives"
8 hrs
Many thanks
Something went wrong...
+2
47 mins

Avoid the Tainted

You want a concise and to the point title, right?
Just a possibility...
Peer comment(s):

neutral Gabo Pena : tainted by disdain!
4 mins
I was throwing out an idea in order to be helpful. I'm not sure what you meant to accomplish with your comment.
agree Robert Donahue (X) : Avoid Those Tainted by Failure (for desperation is a stinky cologne). : )
18 mins
Actually, asker should use "Desperation is a Stinky Perfume". Nice work, Robert!
agree jennifer newsome (X)
30 mins
Thank you.
neutral Angela Dickson (X) : very nice, but I'm not sure I'd recommend it to our dear asker...
7 hrs
Thank you, Angela. Again, I wanted to try something short that grabs you and that a business person would get into. I may or may not work for the asker, but that's up to the asker.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search